Hem Aktuellt Utbildning Forskning Om Juridicum Kontakt Länkar Sök


 Forskarutbildning
  Allmänt
  Hur du söker
  Projektbeskrivning
  Doktorandkurser
  Kontaktuppgifter
  
 Forskningsämnen
 Allmän rättslära
 Civilrätt 
 Europeisk integrationsrätt
 Finansrätt
 Internationell rätt 
 Miljörätt
 Offentlig rätt
 Processrätt
 Rättshistoria
 Rättsinformatik
 Straffrätt
  
  (Ämnen markerade med efter innehåller underämnen)
  
 Forskningsprojekt
  Doktorandprojekt
  Forskningsprojekt
   
  




Forskning - Avslutade avhandlingsprojekt - Spikblad

Prior informed consent and hazardous trade - Regulating trade in hazardous goods at the intersection of sovereignty, free trade and environmental protection
Författare:David Langlet
Disputationsdatum:2007-12-14
Förlag:US-AB Universitetsservice AB, Stockholm, Sweden
Utgivningsår:2007
Omfång:346 sidor
Språk:Engelska
ISBNISBN 978-91-7155-541-0
Abstract

This dissertation analyses the international and to some extent domestic regulation pertaining to trade in hazardous substances. Hazardous trade regulation is found to promote or accommodate three objectives in particular: the strengthening of the ability of (importing) States to exercise control of transboundary flows of hazardous substances; the protection of human health and environment; and the avoidance of impediments to the free flow of goods. The simultaneous pursuance of these objectives entails potential or actual conflicts. 
    


Among the regulatory instruments employed for controlling hazardous trade particular attention is given to prior informed consent (PIC) procedures. These have the potential to strengthen the effective sovereignty of importing States, i.e. their ability to make and enforce informed decisions with respect to import of hazardous substances. These procedures are also compared with export bans, import bans and export notification procedures. It is inter alia asked where different trade-restricting measures place the right to make decisions and whether that right is combined with any means by which such decisions may be enforced.
    


It is concluded that there is no general international law requirement for PIC for transboundary shipments of hazardous substances. Such a requirement may, however, with certain caveats be substantiated for hazardous wastes. It is also concluded that the effective operation of PIC procedures requires the availability of substantial resources in both exporting States and importing States. This may argue for the application of e.g. export bans to particularly hazardous substances. PIC procedures are on the other hand more flexible, better at empowering importing States and are also less likely to conflict with free-trade law compared to many bans. PIC is in itself no guarantee for a particular level of environmental protection.



Keywords: prior informed consent; PIC; trade bans; effective sovereignty; environmental law; free trade law; hazardous substances; waste; chemicals; genetically modified organisms.

 
Juridiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet | Copyright: 2013 | Webmaster | Utskrift Öppna utskriftsvänlig sida